Incineration
It
is well recognized that Dows Midland plant incinerators and
tar burners were the major source of the toxic dioxins and
furans still being found today at very high levels in
Midland Area soils.
There may be a tendency to minimize Dows responsibility
with the assumption that the company was unaware that the
emissions from the incinerators were toxic to downwind
employees and city residents. With the limited
analytical capability that was available in the 1930s to
1950s, it is certain that Dow did not know that dioxins and
furans were present in the dark smoke and black soot that
frequently settled on Midland.
However, research into the history of the Midland plant reveals a
pattern of continued operation of the tar burners and
chemical waste incinerators even though the units were
emitting large volumes of dark smoke and black soot.
There is ample written evidence that indicates that Dow recognized
that the black smoke and soot were visible signs of
incomplete combustion but continued to operate the units
rather than curtail production levels. The most
probable cause of incomplete combustion chemical waste
loads that exceeded the design capacity of the
incinerators and tar burners.
The
reluctance of the company to match incineration capacity
with growing chemical waste volumes resulted in the burning
of chemical wastes in the on-site powerhouses the 1960's
and, possibly, into the 1970's.
It is difficult to understand, with the knowledge that Dow
must have
developed (even in the 1930s and 1940s) about the toxicity
of its chemical wastes, that the company wasnt aware of the
potential toxicity of the emissions resulting from the
incomplete incineration of hazardous chemical wastes. Very
simple animal vapor exposure tests, well within Dows
technical capability, would have confirmed the toxic nature
of the emissions. Samples taken of the tar-like residues
that collected inside the chimneys of the tar burners and
incinerators could have been tested to determine acute
toxicity. There is no published information that this
rudimentary testing was ever carried out.
Each
reader should decide which is worse continued incineration
and tar burning operations recognizing that emissions were
hazardous or a failure to determine whether the emissions
were harmless or toxic.
An overview has
been written that traces the historic development of
incineration technology at the Midland plant from the first
coal-fired tar burner to the state-of-the-art air pollution
control equipment that is able to meet Federal and state dioxin
emission limits.
The
overview contains information on the following topics.
Dow incinerators and tar burners
TCDD levels in chemical
waste
tars
Incineration of waste tars in on-site powerhouses
The
link to the overview is
Incineration Overview
|