What's New: Archives
May 19, 2005
- Revisions to "Dioxin Serum Levels"
Greater attention is now being
given to dioxin blood serum levels in residents residing
along the Tittabawassee River. Some of the information
that has been reported is incorrect and possibly misleading.
DioxinSpin.com is being expanded
to include more information on this extremely important
topic.
April 18,
2005 - Dioxin Newsletters
The "Framework" for a proposed
agreement between The Dow Chemical Company and the DEQ
requires that the company send each of the Priority 1
property owners a "dioxin communication package".
DioxinSpin.com has obtained a
copy of Dow's initial proposal which is based on supplying a
copy of the various dioxin pamphlets developed by various MI
and US regulatory agencies.
While this information is
valuable in providing general information on dioxins, the
proposal does not provide a complete picture of the
potential impact on human health from dioxin exposure in the
Midland area.
DioxinSpin.com will be mailing
Dioxin Newsletters to the Priority 1 property owners
in order to provide additional information on dioxin topics
that might be of interest to persons that reside on dioxin
contaminated properties. The first Newsletter was
mailed the week of April 11, 2005.
The Newsletters will also be
available on this website. Readers that find the
information to be of value are welcome to distribute copies
to other interested persons or at dioxin information
meetings.
More information and copies of
the Newsletters can be found via the "Dioxin Newsletters"
button on the left side of the page.
March 16,
2005 - "Flawed Science"
The importance of "sound
science" in helping to resolve the various issues associated
with dioxin contamination in Dow's Midland plant, in Midland
and in the Saginaw Valley can not be emphasized enough.
In the November, 2004 issue of Community Update, the
company said:
"Dow strongly believes that the
only way to find real solutions to this situation is by
knowing the facts." "We continue to welcome your
feedback and comments as we work thought this issue.
Thank you for your ongoing interest and support."
"Your input is essential. We want to hear from you."
Based on Dow's desire for
factual information, DioxinSpin has been revised to include
a new section "FLAWED SCIENCE". (See link on
left side of page)
The section will provide an
analysis of potential mistakes and oversights that might be
present in the company's various studies on the effects of
dioxin exposure on human health. Each "analysis" will
focus on a single concept and will generally be no more than
4 to 5 pages in length. Hopefully, "Flawed
Science" will be an "easy read" for the reader with
a non-technical background.
DioxinSpin welcomes comments and
criticism from not only the company but also from any reader
with an interest in dioxin contamination issues.
March 10,
2005 - Furans in the river
The Dow Chemical Web site has
posted information as to the potential impact of furans from
the very early chlorine cells on the present day levels of
dioxins/furans being found in the Tittabawassee River.
The information suggests that the company may have lost a
great deal of its dioxin-related "expertise" and knowledge
of the Midland operations.
DioxinSpin has provided an
analysis and comments of the company's chlorine cell
information including specific dioxin "expertise" and
historical items that the company's writers may not have
been aware of.
Link to :
"Forgotten Science - Forgotten
History"
February 17,
2005 - "Framework" For A Proposed Agreement
In January, 2005, the Michigan
DEQ and The Dow Chemical Company agreed to a "Framework For
An Agreement" to resolve many of the issues associated with
dioxin contamination of Midland area soils and the
floodplain of the Tittabawassee River. The "Framework"
was negotiated without public comment.
1. The "Framework"
is based on an incorrect assumption that dioxin
contamination of Midland was the result of emissions from a
single source : the company's incinerator complex.
Modeling of dioxin levels in the neighborhoods selected for
reduction of dioxin exposure indicates that the Wexford
Avenue neighborhood may have been contaminated by at least
two sources of emissions. If the modeling is
correct, then the "Olde Towne" portion of Midland was also
affected by the two sources. To date, "Olde Towne" has
been sampled at only one location to determine dioxin
levels. The "Framework" does not require any
additional sampling of Midland area soils until 2006, at the
earliest.
2. The "Framework"
established the March, 2004 flooding as a criteria for
activities to reduce the potential for dioxin exposure being
experienced by Tittabawassee River residents. However,
the record flood of September, 1986 (crest = 33.94 ft) was
more extensive than the March, 2004 flood (crest = 27.45
ft). The 1986 flood inundated an area approximately
seven (7) times greater than that flooded in 2004.
On the basis of the 2004 flood,
the "Framework" identified 140 riverside properties as
Priority 1 locations entitled to some degree of residential
cleanup and other dioxin exposure reduction activities.
The number of residences entitled to dioxin cleanup based on
the 1986 flooding is not known at this time.

October 5,
2004 - New Zealand TCDD Body Burden Study
In September, 2004, the New
Zealand Ministry of Health released the results of a study
that correlated TCDD body burden levels with TCDD soil
levels for 24 long term residents that lived in proximity to
a 2,4,5-T plant owned and operated by Ivon Watkins-Dow from
1960 to 1987. The plant also produced
trichlorophenol (and TCDD) from 1969 to 1987.
The plant is now part of Dow AgroSciences. A summary
of the findings of the study and estimates of TCDD body
burden levels in some MIdland, MI and Tittabawassee River
residents is provided
More information is available
via "Dioxin Body Burdens" on the left hand side of the page.
August 3,
2004 - Dow Mortality Studies Are Once Again Available On Dow
Website
The mortality studies that Dow
Chemical offered as evidence that there is no convincing
evidence of links between specific cancers and potential
dioxin exposure are once again available on a Dow web site.
A link to the site is as follows:
http://www.dom.com/facilities/namerica/michigan/dioxin/scientific/health.htm
Many thanks to those readers
that might have sent an e-mail to Dow asking for the new web
location of the studies. Rumors have been circulating
that the Midland Daily News was considering a story about
why Dow removed these "critical" reports from the internet.
In a community, such as Midland,
with a large population of researchers that routinely
practice a free exchange of scientific information, removal
of the studies would have raised questions about the
validity of the studies. Although sometimes flawed, these
studies are still a vital part of Dow's overall dioxin
strategy. The risk of losing support of the scientific
members of the community by no longer allowing easy access
to the studies may have caused Dow to rethink their removal.
Dow has yet (as of Feb. 17,
2005) to post the
most recent updates of the mortality of its dioxin exposed
workers : KM Bodner, et al, Cancer risk for chemical
workers exposed to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin, Occup. Env. Med. 2003: 60:672-675 and the unpublished
JM Ramlow, et al, Ten-Year Update of a Cohort Study of
Workers with Potential Exposure to Higher Chlorinated
Dioxins, 1997.
Bodner, 2003 is available in
DioxinSpin.com "Mortality Studies A". DioxinSpin.com
has a hard copy of Ramlow, 1997. If Dow does not add
this study to its web site in the near future, perhaps
DioxinSpin.com will provided that Dow gives permission.
It's a credit to Dow that the
first study that is listed is the NIOSH, Fingerhut, 1991
study that clearly shows several linkages between dioxin
exposure and elevated mortality from certain cancers.
This study evaluated the mortality of 5,100 dioxin-exposed
chemical workers from 12 different companies. Dow's
2,200 dioxin employees were part of the study cohort.
The NIOSH study is an excellent example of an objective and
comprehensive epidemiology study and well worth the reading.
DioxinSpin.com has questioned
the data, methodology and the conclusions of some of the Dow
studies. Specific comments can be found in the
sections (see left side of page) with "Mortality" was part
of the title.
July 9, 2004
- Midland Dioxin Levels In Prior Years; Mortality of Midland
Plant Workers
It is well recognized that the
Midland community has very high levels of dioxins much
higher that the typical Michigan or US community.
Mathematical modeling of dioxin
levels for the years when Dow's chemical waste incinerators
and tar burners were in operation indicates that maximum
dioxins levels in the community may have been more than 12
times higher than those measured in 1996 max 3,690 ppt-TEQ
vs. 289 ppt-TEQ.
Modeling of dioxin levels at
Dow's Midland plant indicates that maximum levels were more
than 25 times higher than the average dioxin levels measured
in 1996 by the DEQ max 83,903 ppt-TEQ vs. 3,255 ppt-TEQ.
Modeling using dioxin levels
found in 1996 at a potentially undisturbed location, inside
the Midland plant fenceline, suggests that maximum dioxin
levels could have been more than 200 times greater than the
average levels found in 1996 max 656,340 ppt-TEQ vs. 3,255
ppt-TEQ.
More information on dioxin
levels in prior years can be found in the "Dioxin Levels"
section or via this direct link:
Link to Dioxin Levels in Prior Years
Although information on the
impact of wide-spread dioxin exposure to Midland plant
employees is very limited, there are some Dow studies that
suggest that the Midland plant location has a significant
elevation in both very rare cancers and mesothelioma, a
cancer normally associated with asbestos exposure. The
NIOSH, 1991 study indicates a possible linkage between
deaths from the very rare cancers and dioxin exposure.
More information on the
mortality of Midland plant workers can be found in the
"Dioxin Toxicity" section or via this direct link:
Link to Midland Worker Mortality
June 10, 2004
- Mortality Statistics
There seems to be some confusion
on that part of some Midland and river residents as to why,
if dioxin exposure is so harmful, there has not been a
cancer "epidemic". Without such an epidemic, the
risk of dioxin exposure must be significantly overrated.
This opinion may be shared by many Midland and river
residents.
There is a very fine line
between a "statistically significant" elevation of cancer
mortality and "no causal relationship". Assuming that
there are 5000 long term residents along the river, the
difference between these two widely different findings is
approximately 34 additional deaths spread over 45 years
spread over more than 20 miles of river hardly epidemic
proportions.
Dioxin exposure does cause an
elevated mortality from cancer. However, the
additional (and un-necessary deaths) occur over the course
of many years. These additional deaths may be
noticeable only to an epidemiologist and to the deceased
and their families.
For more information, go to
Mortality Statistics
May 21, 2004
- Overview of Dow's Incinerators and Tar Burners
An overview of the past Midland
plant chemical waste incinerators and tar burners from the
1930's to the present has been assembled. The overview
also provides information on waste tar incineration in Dow's
powerhouses during the 1060's.
Link to Incineration Overview
May 13, 2004
- Information on Two Chemical Waste Ponds Reclaimed as
Building Sites - Possible Chemical Exposure to Employees
(Aerial Photographs Available)
A 1949 aerial photograph of
Dow's Midland Plant indicated the presence of two chemical
waste ponds that had been filled-in during 1949 to the early
1950's and reclaimed for use as sites for several
manufacturing plants, warehouses and office buildings.
Link to Waste
Ponds
May 9, 2005 -
Correction to Comments on Dow's Scope of Work on Tittabawassee River
The MDEQ has informed me that,
due to system improvements, Dow is no longer allowed
to turn off the Revetment Groundwater Interceptor System (RGIS)
when the river is overflowing the sheet piling that
separates the collection tile from the river.
The March 25, 2004 (pg 7)
comments to the MDEQ on Dow's proposed Scope of Work for the
Tittabawassee River contained out-of-date information.
The original comments are available below on this
page.
May 6, 2005 -
Mortality Studies "C" Added
Dow carried out two mortality
studies on more than 35,000 employees that worked in the
Midland and Bay City sites. These studies examined
worker mortality from 1940 to 1982 and from 1940 to 1994.
Although the studies were
not dioxin-specific, the data indicates that general
chemical exposure can result in increased mortality,
especially from certain specific cancers. Cancer
mortality for hourly employees increased with duration of
employment and hourly workers with more than 20 years of
employment demonstrated statistically significant elevations
of several cancer categories. The 1940 to 1982 study
failed to include approximately 6,250 employees that worked
in Dow's Bay City Magnesium Foundry even though the foundry
workers clearly met the cohort criteria.
The 1940 to 1994 study provided
details on the elevated mortality of the foundry workers. Due
to the large number of changes made to the study cohort, the
study can not be considered as an update of the 1940-1982
study.
DioxinSpin.com commentary is
presented that shows that the 1940-1994 study was based on
questionable methodologies that may have invalidated the
conclusion that worker health is better than the national
average.
April 16,
2004 - Mortality Studies "B" Added
Dow has stated that the Dow
workers (n = 2,092) that were included in the NIOSH, 1991
mortality study of dioxin exposed chemical workers had lower
overall mortality and total cancer mortality than did the
3,080 workers that worked for the other eleven companies in
the study. However, an examination of data indicates
that Dow employees had higher mortalities in eight (8)
cancer categories while the other companies' employees had
higher mortalities in only five (5) cancer categories.
DioxinSpin.com analysis provides a side-by-side comparison of cancer
mortalities of the Dow employees and the non-Dow employees.
This website section also contains a
side-by-side comparison of the mortality of Dow employees as
determined by one NIOSH and six Dow epidemiology studies.
The "clustering" of elevated mortalities for certain cancers
is especially noticeable.
April 13, 2004 -
Chloracne Incident Added
Chloroacne is a skin condition that is normally associated
with exposure to high levels of chlorinated aromatic
compounds, such as dioxins and furans. TCDD is
recognized as the chemical that causes the greatest
chloro-agenic response in humans.
Prior to the startup of Dow's new 2,4,5-trichlorophenol
plant in 1963, the incidence of chloroacne in the
Chlorophenol production plants was very low with only 1-3
cases per year being observed.
Dow's new 2,4,5-trichlorophenol process produced
significantly higher levels of TCDD than did the old process.
Thirty five (35) new chloroacne cases were reported in
the first year of production. Dow shutdown the new
plant for approximately one year to decontaminate equipment
and to install approximately $5 million of new equipment to
remove the high amounts of TCDD in the product.
The
new plant continued to struggle with high levels of chloroacne
for the entire operating life of the plant.
In 1970, a record high 90 chloroacne cases were experienced.
Despite the fact that Dow continued to claim that TCDD
exposure only resulted in a mild skin condition, it is
believed that once a worker was diagnosed with chloroacne,
the employee was assigned a job in a non-TCDD plant.
Dow
has never fully released the full details of the chloroacne
"incident". The website summary is based on
information contained in several Dow reports and on the
author's personal experience.
April 13 -
Mortality Studies "A" Amended
In
2002, Dow updated the mortality of its 2,100+ employees that
had been exposed to dioxins. The Bodner, et al,
2002 study examined the mortality of these workers from 1940
to 1994.
The
update failed to clarify vague areas in several previous Dow
studies and failed to provide an update on mortality from
"Rare Cancers of Other and Unspecified Sites", a category
that several Dow studies found to be significantly elevated
for the dioxin cohort and for the Midland plant in general.
This
section contains a copy of the Bodner, 2002 study plus
DioxinSpin.com comments on the study.
As
part of the RCRA operating permit for Dow's hazardous waste
facilities at the Midland site, Dow was required to submit a
proposed Remedial Investigation Scope of Work (SOW) for
Midland Area Soils and for the Tittabawassee River and its
Floodplain contaminated with dioxins, furans and other toxic
compounds. Dow submitted the required SOW to the MDEQ
on August 11, 2003.
When
Dow failed to agree to the changes being requested by the
MDEQ, the company was issued a Notice of Deficiency on December 12,
2003. Failure to respond to the Notice of Deficiency
could have resulted in a withdrawal of the operating
permits.
On
February 17, 2004, Dow submitted a revised Scope of Work and
the MDEQ is currently reviewing the SOW.
Upon
careful review, I believe that the SOW has several
deficiencies.
Midland Area Soils
1. The number of locations to be sampled is far below
the number of sampled locations required for a 95%
confidence level that all areas of high dioxin
contamination have been found.
2. The proposed sampling will only determine the
dioxin levels in the first 1" to 3" of top soil.
Earlier sampling in Emerson Park indicated that dioxin
levels continued to increase with greater depths.
Samples taken 15" below ground had TCDD-TEQ levels
that were 4X the levels found in the first 1" of soil.
3. The Midland neighborhoods that were to be sampled
were based on dioxin contamination patterns resulting from
the 703/830 Bldg. incinerators. The proposed sampling
plan did not take into account the dioxin patterns resulting
from chemical waste incineration in the three on-site
powerhouses.
These three deficiencies were summarized in a March 19,2004
letter that was sent to both Dow and the MDEQ.
A
full copy of the letter can be read by selecting
the link below:

Tittabawassee River Sediments
This
portion of the SOW had the following deficiencies:
1. The number of locations that were sampled is far below
the number of sampled locations required for a 95%
confidence level that all areas of high dioxin
contamination have been found.
2.
A number of floodplain locations had dioxin levels that
increased with greater depth. More sampling at greater
depths is needed to better define the extent of dioxin
contamination at all levels in the floodplain.
3.
The proposed clay and topsoil barrier may be washed away
during springtime flooding. Penetration of the barrier
may not be noticeable and dioxin exposure may occur, as well
as dioxin re-distribution. A clay-plastic
liner-clay-topsoil barrier was recommended.
4.
The MDEQ's comments about the need to determine if the
release of hazardous pollutants were still occurring were
supported. Information as to the historic operation of
the chemical waste ponds and leakage of organic compounds
from the ponds into the river was provided.
These deficiencies were detailed in the March 25, 2004
letter that was sent to both the MDEQ and to Dow.
A
full copy of the letter can be read by selecting
the link below:
Correction: Information was
provided on pg 7 that the revetment collection system is
turned off when the river flooded over the sheet piling.
This information is no longer correct. Improvements
have been made to the collection system and the collection
system is no longer allowed to be turned off under any
circumstances.

Community Advisory Panel
In 2004, the MDEQ established a Community
Advisory Panel as a mechanism to solicit input on various
issues in managing the dioxin contamination that exists in
the rivers, floodplain and City of Midland.
Information was provided to Mr.
Vince Castellanos, a member of the CAP, on the impact of
soil-related dioxins on daily dioxin intake, dioxin body
burdens and resulting health risks.
The information contains
estimates of Daily Dioxin Intakes for both children
and adults that are exposed to varying levels of dioxins
found in the Midland Area soils and floodplain soils.
Estimates of Dioxin Body Burdens are provided, as
well as, cancer death rates from epidemiology studies
that correlated dioxin body burden levels with cancer
mortality.
A full copy of the letter sent
to Mr. Castellanos with this information can be read by
selecting the link below:

[Return
to Home Page]
|